🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.