🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.